77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Unfortunately, that was not legitimate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son informed his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to acquiring sexually molested the pair’s son several times.
four. Record shows that the petitioner has become booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in All those cases, it does, prima facie, set up that the petitioner is vulnerable to repeating the offence.
Deterrence: The fear of severe consequences, like capital punishment, is meant to deter probable criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is critical in reducing the incidence of intentional killings.
Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation incorporates the names from the parties to the first case, the court in which the case was heard, the date it had been decided, along with the book in which it is recorded. Different citation requirements may possibly include italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
6. Mere involvement in a heinous offence is not any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled to the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, given that then He's powering the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more needed for further investigation, therefore, his ongoing incarceration would not provide any helpful purpose at this stage.
Section 302 in the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be matter on the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears plus a new system is set in its place.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and steadiness. It demonstrates the commitment from the state to protect its click here citizens and copyright the rule of law.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to some healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions within the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental regulation in Pakistan, it really is important that the case founded the application in the precautionary principle where there can be a risk to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations of the State in protecting the right to a clean and healthy environment.
competent authority has determined the eligibility from the private respondents and found them for being in good shape for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)